A problem with this account, however, is that the use of red and green as signal colors dates back to World War I railroad signals, long after the late-1700s as suggested by Blockson. Nevertheless, it is possible that runaway slaves and their supporters used red colors to indicate danger and green colors to mean it was safe to stop. After all, it only needed to be understood by runaway slaves and their helpers, and any agreed upon signals could work. For example, a scarf of any color around the jockey's arm might mean safety.
Another potential problem with this story is that runaway slaves often traveled at night and the darkness would have made it difficult to see different shades of cloth; difficult, to be sure, but not impossible. Frankly, no system for escape was without problems for the slave. If a slave had to get precariously close to a home to see the signal, well, that is what he or she had to do. And, though it was not preferred, some runaway slaves traveled in daylight. Of course, a signal would have been easy to send by lighting a lantern and placing it in the hand of the lawn jockey so that light-off might have meant that the house was full and had no more room for runaways. I do not doubt that a black-faced lawn ornament was used as a signal to slaves. After all, there had to be ways to send otherwise cryptic messages to runaways, and given that slavery lasted more than two hundred years, it is likely that it happened at least once. Nevertheless, there is little evidence that this practice was widespread.
How Do I Get Away With Not Doing Homework sincler cavaliere mi
Right now, as the hour grows near...we need to make a clear, concise, wise and unobstructed choice as to which Democratic candidate has the best chance of beating McCain...That's just the bare-naked truth of the matter...The alternative is unacceptable...This country has been damaged so severely in the last 7+ years by the current administration that I personally feel we need someone who's been there before or very close to it...The past elections scared me to my core...The imbecilic 'sheep' of this country, with the help of those who threw their vote away on the likes of a narcissist-Nader (or chose not to vote at all (which was inexcusable, considering the circumstances and importance of what was hanging in the balance 'OF OUR CHILDREN'S FUTURES!!' Or if you place ANY value on human life, whatsoever)...And lastly...& most importantly: 'How America allowed the (election,HA!) to be completely hijacked, held hostage, then outright stolen (or bought and paid for...either way, it was done openly for all-to-see, regardless of how illegal)...Just the simple fact that people, who have audacity to call themselves 'Americans' stood by and watched one of the most morally and ethically bankrupt instances in history take place 'without so much as making a peep'...Deciding instead to take the advice of the village idiot and 'go shopping'...I don't know...I just don't know what else to say...I'm saying the same things now that I said during the very 1st debate (Poor Gore, I still feel bad for what he was subjected to without a fistfight...That took will-power!)...I was really unable to even put two words together, in hopes of forming anything 'even' resembling a sentence...(then, the 'after the debate' political-pundit, talking-heads and their unbelievably-stupid comments...which continue on (& on) today...And yes, once again...yes, I'll say it once again..."We are surely 'all' headed straight to hell...in a petroleum-based, lead-painted, chinese-made, plastic handbasket (from walmart)...sadly, its deserved...that could the saddest part of it all (naturally, I mean besides the all the body bags and families without children or futures)..the saddest thing is that 'we deserve it', because 'for all the INACTION, we have to face the REACTION'...In closing, I really think we must have experience over anything else to close this election and get our country back on track...I think the republicans 'want' Obama as an opponent, simply because they can turn the reverend's comments into 'a doubt'...and they will given the opportunity...without question...THEY WILL...
First of all a preacher shouldn't be damning America to its parishiners if he doesn't like it go live somewhere else no one is forcing him to stay. He said alot of anti-american remarks and Obama should have denounced him from day one thats one reason I will not support him. I just can't trust him there is something about him that is not trustworthy from the people he dealt with to never really answering honestly questions about his relations with these anti-americans. Every church I've been to has never cut down blacks or america and if this isn't racial I don't know what is . We are talking about the next President here not a grocery clerk lets get real. I hope Hillary goes Independant and takes away his chances from becoming the first anti-american President.
We need to understand what the media heads tried to do. The media has an agenda as well. Who owns the media? I am sure that only a few top people are responsible for what we hear and what we don't hear. Why do we hear about Brittany Spears but not about a bill that passed and how it is going to affect our lives? Most people are busy day to day trying to make ends meet and spending time with family. SO we don't pay close attention to the people we put in office to protect us. The Dr. Wright story is another distraction away from who we really need to question, the bureaucracy. This is supposed to be a democracy, for the people by the people. Not lobbyist cutting deals that only help a small group of people. We the people (all of us).
Yes, it is true that whe pressed at the National Press Club, Wright evaded the substance of the direct question put to him, with his own flippant comment that the government was "capable" of doing such a thing. It would be nice, wouldn't it, if Wright would answer the question squarely and without equivocation.
For me, Wright gave away his position when he turned on the questioner at the National Press Club and asked, "Have you read Horowitz's book?" The reference was to a crackpot theorist who wrote a book alleging that there was in fact a government conspiracy and/or a major biological accident that created the HIV/AIDS virus. Wright doesn't have the personal command of those facts, so instead he tosses the notion out, with a wink, saying, "It might be true!", just as it might be true that the mafia killed John F. Kennedy, or it might be true that the Apollo mon landing was a hoax.
I see that there are still some people who are deluded and think that racial strife in America is something that is just a minor annoyance. They wax eloquently like a Rodney King, talking about can't we all just get along. They don't see it, the insidious and destructive way that racism has entrenched itself in the very being of some people and perpetuates itself generation after generation. These people with blinders are lamenting the same old song since the beginning of slavery, "Hey, everybody else has it bad too, what's your beef?" If you think that the Indians aren't feeling the pains of the past, read a book, visit a reservation. Last hired, first fired, police racial profiling, or just straight up police brutality, being dragged behind trucks, are just some examples that racism is alive and well. Rev. Wright is not racism, Rev. Wright is a response to racism. You can't just wish something away. If you want racism to end, then find out what it is, define it, talk about it, don't do it yourself, and make sure when it shows up in your presence, you let it know it's not welcome. Stop suffering from naivete, misinformation, ego, and hurt feelings, or you'll be stuck in that circle of perpetual slave and master. The person who hasn't been burned by the fire shouldn't be telling the one who has how to feel. Empathy, try it on, see how it fits.
And all this "controversy" hasn't changed my opinion at all about Barack Obama. I personally think he is the best candidate in this race because I like his politics the best. And a big part of why I like Obama's politics is because I know he has worked hard for human rights. And I wouldn't be surprised if Reverend Wright inspired Obama to do a lot of what he did for human rights. I couldn't help feeling inspired by a lot of what I heard Wright say on your show. What I hate about these "controversies" is that they imply that we expect our politicians (of all people) to be perfect and say and do the right thing all the time. So they're all too scared to do or say what they really believe, to focus on what their jobs should be: Making sure all Americans have food, safety, healthcare, and a place to live. I feel confident that both Clinton and Obama entered politics because they truly believed that everyone has the right to those things. I personally believe that is the main difference between the left and the right. People on the left tend to feel that everyone should have food, safety, healthcare, and a place to live, and that people who need help should be helped. Interestingly, the founders of the US, and most religions agree with this view. People on the right tend to think that only those who are strong enough (or have the means) deserve to have these things. Of course I'm over-generalizing here, but I do see this as a defining difference. My personal opinion is that Obama has the best record and credentials in helping people who need help and in being against using violence for anything but self-defense, and is most likely to try solving problems (ours and other nations') through talking. But I originally liked Edwards the best, because I felt like he said all the things he believed in without trying to be perfect. And I feel that all the over-scrutinization that's been going on has made both Obama and Clinton into political machines. And the media seem to be doing the same thing. This bizarre, post-911, "bring 'em on," support-the-troops-by-keeping-them-in-Iraq patriotism seems to have made everyone too afraid to ask if we're really doing the right thing. Is the military really the right tool for helping the Iraqis--and their neighboring countries--solve their disputes? And maybe we do need to look at the kinds of things we've done to other people around the world when we're trying to figure out why people want to attack us. 2ff7e9595c
Comments